All Issue

2026 Vol.34, Issue 1

Research Article

28 February 2026. pp. 1~26
Abstract
This study aims to seek the direction for the development of ‘World Climate’ education, a key subject in primary geography education. Currently, Korean education emphasizes the classification of climatic zones and spatial distribution, often presenting the relationship between climate and human life through a linear perspective. Recognizing these limitations, this study analyzed the curricula and academic literature of the United Kingdom, France, Australia, and Japan to explore alternative approaches. The findings indicate that these countries systematically structure their curricula by connecting climate to concepts such as human-nature interactions and ‘habiter’. Additionally, relevant research highlights the importance of exploring the cultural values of climate and implementing pedagogical strategies to address learners’ misconceptions. Based on these findings, this study proposes three directions for improvement. First, it suggests introducing the concept of Climate Placeness, which understands climate as a foundation of life and place identity. Second, it recommends restructuring learning contents hierarchically by considering spatial concepts, representational tools, and reasoning processes. Third, it emphasizes teaching and learning strategies that respect students’ misconceptions as alternative frameworks and promote conceptual change through cognitive conflict. The findings of this study contribute to enhancing students’ geographical literacy and to transforming world climate learning into meaningful education that enables learners to explore the relationship between climate and human life in a multidimensional way.
본 연구는 초등 사회과 지리 영역의 핵심 주제인 ‘세계의 기후’ 교육이 나아가야 할 방향을 모색하는 데 목적이 있다. 한국의 현행 ‘세계의 기후’ 교육은 기후대 구분 및 공간적 분포 파악을 중시하며, 기후와 인간 생활의 관계를 단선적으로 설명하는 경향이 있다. 이에 본 연구는 현행 교육과정의 한계를 보완할 수 있는 대안적 접근을 탐색하고자 영국, 프랑스, 오스트레일리아, 일본의 교육과정 및 관련 학술 연구 문헌을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 해외 주요국의 교육과정은 기후를 자연과 인간의 상호작용 및 ‘거주하기’ 등의 개념과 연계하여 체계적으로 조직하고 있었으며, 학술 연구에서는 기후의 문화적 가치 탐구와 학습자 오개념에 대한 교수학적 접근 등을 강조하고 있었다. 이를 토대로 본 연구는 세 가지 개선 방안을 제안한다. 첫째, 기후를 삶과 장소의 정체성으로 이해하는 ‘기후 장소성’ 개념의 도입이다. 둘째, 공간 개념, 표상 도구, 추론 과정을 고려한 학습 내용의 위계적 재구조화이다. 셋째, 학습자의 오개념을 대안 개념으로 존중하고 인지적 갈등을 통해 과학적 개념으로 변화시키는 교수·학습 전략의 적용이다. 본 연구의 논의는 초등학교 ‘세계의 기후’ 학습이 학습자의 지리적 소양을 함양하고, 기후와 인간의 관계를 입체적으로 탐구하는 실질적인 교육으로 거듭나는 데 기여할 것이다.
References
  1. 교육과학기술부, 2008, 초등학교 교육과정 해설(Ⅲ): 국어·도덕·사회, 서울: 교육과학기술부.
  2. 교육부, 2015, 사회과 교육과정(교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책 7]), 세종: 교육부.
  3. 교육부, 2022, 사회과 교육과정(교육부 고시 제2022-33호 [별책 7]), 세종: 교육부.
  4. 김다원, 2023, “기후변화에 대응하는 자연지리 교육의 방향: 초등 자연지리 교육을 중심으로”, 대한지리학회지, 58(5), 503-519.
  5. 김진국, 2005, “초·중등학교 지형 및 기후 단원의 계열성 분석”, 한국지리환경교육학회지, 13(3), 419-435.
  6. 남상준·장혜정, 2025, “교과지리학의 성립 가능성 탐색”, 한국지리환경교육학회지, 33(2), 49-62.
  7. 마경묵, 2011, “공간적 사고의 평가를 위한 지리 평가 도구의 개발”, 한국지리환경교육학회지, 19(2), 69-89.10.17279/jkagee.2011.19.2.69
  8. 송원섭, 2023, “문화지리교육에서 환경결정론 교육내용에 대한 비판적 고찰”, 대한지리학회지, 58(3), 330-343.
  9. 심승희·권정화, 2013, “영국의 2014 개정 지리교육과정의 특징과 그 시사점”, 한국지리환경교육학회지, 21(3), 17-31.
  10. 윤옥경·유수진, 2023, “2022 개정 교육과정 초등 지리 영역 개발과 주요 특징”, 한국지리환경교육학회지, 31(1), 15-27.
  11. 조철기, 2014, “영국 국가지리교육과정 개정과 지식 논쟁”, 대한지리학회지, 49(3), 456-471.
  12. 조철기, 2018, 핵심 지리교육학, 서울: 푸른길.
  13. 조철기·권정화, 2005, “지리적 자아로서의 학습자와 지리탐구에 근거한 학습의 논리”, 한국지리환경교육학회지, 13(3), 333-347.
  14. 최승혜·최정인·유정숙, 2020, “장소기반교육(PBE)에 근거한 생태교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용”, 환경교육, 33(3), 262-277.
  15. ACARA(Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority), 2022, Humanities and Social Sciences(Version 9.0) HASS F-6, https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/downloads/learning-areas#accordion-b55f53a07f-item-704ea2a7c5, 2025. 11. 18.
  16. Ausubel, D. P., 1968, Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  17. Bozkurt, F., 2019, Evaluation of Geography Textbooks in Terms of Misconceptions about Climate Topic, Review of International Geographical Education Online, 9(1), 149-170.10.33403/rigeo.573480
  18. Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006, Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  19. Campo-Pais, B., Morales, A. J., Morote, A. F., and Souto, X. M, 2021, Environmental Problems and Geographic Education: A Case Study: Learning About the Climate and Landscape in Ontinyent(Spain), Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(90), 1-13. 10.1057/s41599-021-00761-6
  20. Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation, 2017, Cognitive Load Theory: Research That Teachers Really Need to Understand, Sydney: NSW Department of Education.
  21. DfE(Department for Education), 2013, National Curriculum in England: Geography Programmes of Study, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-geography-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-geography-programmes-of-study#key-stage-1, 2025. 11. 18.
  22. Driver, R. and Easley, J., 1978, Pupils and Paradigms: A Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students, Studies in Science Education, 5(1), 61-84.10.1080/03057267808559857
  23. Gagné, R. M., 1968, Learning Hierarchies, Educational Psychologist, 6, 1-9. 10.1080/00461526809528968
  24. Gibb, N., 2021, The Importance of a Knowledge-Rich Curriculum, Department for Education, Gov.uk, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-importance-of-a-knowledge-rich-curriculum, 2025. 11. 27.
  25. Hajian, S., 2019, Transfer of Learning and Teaching: A Review of Transfer Theories and Effective Instructional Practices, Journal of Education, 7(1), 93-111.10.22492/ije.7.1.06
  26. Hill, R., 2019, Exploring Terroir: A Sense of Place in Food and Farming, Geography, 104(1), 42-18.10.1080/00167487.2019.12094061
  27. Harrington, J., 2008, Misconceptions: Barriers to Improved Climate Literacy, Physical Geography, 29(6), 575-584. 10.2747/0272-3646.29.6.575
  28. Hulme, M., 2008, Geographical Work at the Boundaries of Climate Change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(1), 5-11.10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00289.x
  29. Jo, I. and Bednarz, S. W., 2009, Evaluationg Geography Textbook Questions from a Spatial Perspective: Using Concepts of Space, Tools of Representation, and Cognitive Processes to Evaluating Spatiality, Journal of Geography, 108(1), 4-13.10.1080/00221340902758401
  30. Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., and Ruvel, F., 2006, World Map of the Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification Updated, Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 15(3), 259-263.10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
  31. Lane, R., 2015, Primary Geography in Australia: Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Understandings of Weather and Climate, Review of International Geographical Education Online, 5, 199-217.
  32. MÉNJ(Ministère de I’ Éducation Nationale et de la Jeunesse), 2023, Programmes du Cycle 2, https://eduscol.education.fr/84/j-enseigne-au-cycle-2, 2025. 11. 18.
  33. MÉNJ(Ministère de I’ Éducation Nationale et de la Jeunesse), 2023, Programmes du Cycle 3, https://eduscol.education.fr/87/j-enseigne-au-cycle-3, 2025. 11. 18.
  34. MEXT(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology), 2017, The Course of Study for Elementary Schools, https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/new-cs/1384661.htm, 2025. 11. 18.
  35. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A., 1982, Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change, Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.10.1002/sce.3730660207
  36. Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., and Roschelle, J., 1993, Misconceptions Reconceived: Analysis of Knowledge, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163.10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
  37. Winter, C., 1996, Challenging the Dominant Paradigm in the Geography National Curriculum: Reconstructing Place Knowledge, Curriculum Studies, 4, 367-384. 10.1080/0965975960040304
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Association Of Geographic And Environmental Education
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지리환경교육학회
  • Journal Title :The Journal of The Korean Association of Geographic and Environmental Education
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지리환경교육학회지
  • Volume : 34
  • No :1
  • Pages :1~26
Journal Informaiton The Journal of The Korean Association of Geographic and Environmental Education The Journal of The Korean Association of Geographic and Environmental Education
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • KCI 문헌 유사도 검사
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close